Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-139708

ABSTRACT

Background and Aims: The effectiveness of an ideal antimicrobial agent depends on its ability to kill microbes while causing minimal toxicity to host cells. Several studies have been reported on the antimicrobial effects of chewing sticks (Salvadora persica) on oral bacteria. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of Persica™ and chlorhexidine (CHX) mouthwashes on cultured human and mouse cell lines. Materials and Methods: This was an experimental study. The toxic effects of four dilutions of Persica™ and CHX mouthwashes on KB, Saos-2, J744 A1, and gingival fibroblast cells were evaluated by MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide] assay. The effect of fetal calf serum (FCS) components on the cytotoxicity of these mouthwashes was also investigated. Statistical Analysis: Analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used to evaluate the results. Results: The results indicated that Persica™, at concentrations higher than 0.1%, exerted a very significant cytotoxic effect on all the cell lines (P < 0.01). CHX, at a concentration of 0.001%, exerted toxic effects only on gingival fibroblasts; concentrations higher than 0.001% were required to produce significant cell death in the other cell lines. At all the concentrations under study, both Persica™ and CHX exerted significantly greater cytotoxic effects in the absence of FCS than in its presence (i.e., in control culture medium). The toxicities of both mouthwashes were attenuated in the presence of FCS (10%). Conclusion: Our results indicate that both Persica™ and CHX mouthwashes are toxic to macrophage, epithelial, fibroblast, and osteoblast cells in a concentration-dependent manner.


Subject(s)
Adult , Animals , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/toxicity , Carcinoma/pathology , Cell Death/drug effects , Cell Line , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Chlorhexidine/administration & dosage , Chlorhexidine/toxicity , Colorimetry , Coloring Agents/diagnosis , Culture Media , Culture Media, Serum-Free , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Epithelial Cells/drug effects , Fibroblasts/drug effects , Gingiva/cytology , Gingiva/drug effects , Humans , Macrophages/drug effects , Male , Mice , Mouthwashes/administration & dosage , Mouthwashes/toxicity , Osteoblastoma/pathology , Osteoblasts/drug effects , Plant Extracts/administration & dosage , Plant Extracts/toxicity , Salvadoraceae , Serum , Tetrazolium Salts/diagnosis , Thiazoles/diagnosis
2.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-51570

ABSTRACT

AIM: To examine the effect of three commercial mouth rinses (Hexidine 0.2%, Listerine Cool Mint, Betadine 1%) upon cultured human gingival fibroblast proliferation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human gingival fibroblasts were cultured and incubated in Dulbecco's Minimum Eagle's Medium containing Chlorhexidine, Listerine, Povidone-Iodine at varying concentrations (1%, 2%, 5%, 10%, 20% and 100% of the given solution) at 37 degrees C for 1, 5 and 15 min. Control cells received an equal volume of Dulbecco's Minimum Eagle's Medium without adding mouth rinses, for similar duration of exposure at 37 degrees C. Following incubation the media were removed, cells were washed twice with medium, supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum, and fibroblasts in the test and control group were allowed to recover in the same media for 24 h. RESULTS: In all the three groups, the proliferation inhibition was dependent on the concentration of solublized mouth rinses in the cell culture but independent of the duration of exposure to all three mouth rinses. The results showed that all three solutions were toxic to cultured human gingival fibroblasts, Chlorhexidine being the most cytotoxic. It was seen that at dilute concentrations (1% and 2% of given solutions) Listerine was more cytotoxic than Chlorhexidine and Povidone-Iodine. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that Chlorhexidine, Listerine and Povidone-Iodine are capable of inducing a dose-dependent reduction in cellular proliferation of fibroblasts. The results presented are interesting, but to know the clinical significance, further studies are needed.


Subject(s)
Adult , Analysis of Variance , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Cells, Cultured , Chlorhexidine/toxicity , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Combinations , Fibroblasts/drug effects , Gingiva/cytology , Humans , Male , Mouthwashes/toxicity , Povidone-Iodine/toxicity , Salicylates/toxicity , Terpenes/toxicity
3.
Braz. dent. j ; 17(1): 58-62, 2006. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-430135

ABSTRACT

Este estudo investigou se soluções de bochecho nas diluições recomendadas pelos fabricantes podem contribuir para a irritação das mucosas orais. Vinte soluções de bochecho frequentemente utilizadas foram avaliadas por meio do análise do crescimento do tubo polínico. Este teste constitui um método alternativo in vitro para estimar o potencial irritante dos ingredientes de formulações cosméticas. O teste baseia-se numa medição fotométrica da inibição do crescimento de tubos polínicos. A inibição do crescimento é expressa por valores IC50 que caracterizam o potencial citotóxico de uma dada substância. Os valores de IC50 aqui apresentados demonstraram que nenhuma das soluções de bochecho estudadas deve causar irritação aguda das mucosas orais, desde que utilizadas nas diluições recomendadas pelo fabricante. No entanto, verificou-se que pelo menos quatro dos colutórios podem causar irritação aguda das mucosas orais ao serem utilizados na a forma concentrada.


Subject(s)
Humans , Mouthwashes/toxicity , Mouth Mucosa/drug effects , Mouthwashes/chemistry , Pollen/drug effects , Pollen/growth & development
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL